Topic summary
⁠63%5 analyzed articles/videos1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Action results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 2,390 hits. Analysis detected 19,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,307 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,209 of 15,565 topics). This Congressional Action is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Congressional Action
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos