Topic summary
⁠73%5 analyzed articles/videos2,563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conflict Of Interest results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 3,141 hits. Analysis detected 19,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,009 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,525 of 16,562 topics). This Conflict Of Interest is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Conflict Of Interest
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos