Topic summary
⁠18%2 analyzed articles/videos218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Con Edison results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 1,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,117 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,079 of 16,562 topics). This Con Edison is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Con Edison
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,117
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos