Gothamist77%

Woman who fell into Con Ed manhole in NYC died from scald burns, blunt force trauma 50%

By Michael Sol Warren74%

5/21/2026, 5:08:48 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 412 faulty-reasoning hits from 218 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,083 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the article peer group.

A woman who fell into an open Con Edison manhole in Midtown earlier this week died from heat injuries and blunt force trauma, city medical examiners said Thursday. 
The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner determined Donike Gocaj, 56, died of “scald burns with inhalational thermal injury and blunt force trauma of [the] torso,” according to a spokesperson. 
The office ruled her manner of death an accident. 
Gocaj died after falling about 10 feet down the manhole near Fifth Avenue and East 52nd Street on Monday night, police said. 
NYPD officials said she had just gotten out of her parked car when she plunged into the opening, and no construction was happening in the intersection at the time. 
First responders called to the scene around 11:15 p.m. found Gocaj unconscious. 
She was later pronounced dead at a local hospital. 
Con Ed did not immediately respond to a request for comment early Thursday about Gocaj’s cause of death and the status of the utility company’s investigation into the incident. 
The company previously said video footage indicated a “multi-axle truck” had dislodged the manhole cover about 12 minutes before Gocaj parked her car on the street. 
Spokespeople described the incident as a “rare occurrence." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 27.1%Michael Sol Warren: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias27.1%This article: 11.9%Michael Sol Warren: 2.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias11.9%This article: 22.9%Michael Sol Warren: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic22.9%This article: 3.7%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Michael Sol Warren: 8.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 13.3%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 29.8%Michael Sol Warren: 10.3%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias29.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.8%Michael Sol Warren: 4.3%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority29.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 7.7%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.9%Michael Sol Warren: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.7%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.8%Michael Sol Warren: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote13.8%This article: 13.8%Michael Sol Warren: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection13.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.7%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

218 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers67%attributed speech73writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner • 30 words • 100.0% coverageOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner • 9 words • 0.0% coveragepolice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageCon Ed • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCon Ed • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words27% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Unattributed Quote+76.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Office of the Chief Medical Examiner: 76.9%76.9%Quote-first Misdirection+76.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Office of the Chief Medical Examiner: 76.9%76.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.