Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Composting results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 2,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,417 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,725 of 16,562 topics). This Composting is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Composting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,417
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos