Topic summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Naming results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 281 hits . Analysis detected 2,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,495 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,536 of 16,562 topics). This Community Naming is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Community Naming
Topic details
Total words: 3,495
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst