Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comics results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 871 hits. Analysis detected 8,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,015 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,158 of 15,142 topics). This Comics is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Comics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,015
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos