Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 1,267 hits . Analysis detected 10,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,815 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,705 of 16,562 topics). This College is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. College
Topic details
Total words: 4,815
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.6% percentile 5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 18.8% 18.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 26.3% 26.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst