Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coke Ovens results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 2,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,481 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,260 of 16,562 topics). This Coke Ovens is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Coke Ovens
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,481
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.5%18.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos