Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stina Sieg results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 2,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,481 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,205 of 6,628 authors). This Stina Sieg is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Stina Sieg
Author details
Total words: 2,481
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.5% 18.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst