Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Cognitive Science results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 3,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,097 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Cognitive Science is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cognitive Science
Topic details
Total words: 4,097
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos