Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cnn results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,607 hits . Analysis detected 13,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,641 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,339 of 15,689 topics). This Cnn is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Cnn
Topic details
Total words: 17,641
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst