Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clipper System results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 946 hits. Analysis detected 4,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,831 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,669 of 16,562 topics). This Clipper System is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Clipper System
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,831
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.9% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.8%17.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.4%33.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.8%25.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos