Topic summary
⁠21%4 analyzed articles/videos2,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Science results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 960 hits. Analysis detected 9,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,431 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,996 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Science is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Climate Science
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,431
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos