Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shuang-Ye Wu results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 835 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (5,495 of 6,316 authors). This Shuang-Ye Wu is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Shuang-Ye Wu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠13%Shuang-Ye Wu (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,231
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos