Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Justice results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 2,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,456 of 15,765 topics). This Climate Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Climate Justice
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠66%Climate Justice (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.4%16.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos