Topic summary
â 0% 6 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Climate Change Policy results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 2,363 hits . Analysis detected 16,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,210 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Climate Change Policy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Climate Change Policy
Topic details
Total words: 14,210
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst