Author summary
â 17% 2 analyzed articles/videos 70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Skelton results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 1,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 67% (2,218 of 6,628 authors). This George Skelton is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. George Skelton
Author details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst