Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Change Denial results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 2,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,969 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Change Denial is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Climate Change Denial
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠58%Climate Change Denial (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos