Trump Calls Climate Change a Hoax. Americans Aren’t Buying It. 58%

By Dharna Noor58%

7/23/2026, 11:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,002 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.3% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,395 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the article peer group.

This story was originally published b y the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. 
Amid a summer of dangerous heat , drought , and floods , a majority of Americans are connecting increasingly severe weather to the climate crisis, new polling shows, despite efforts by Donald Trump to dismiss global heating as a “con job” and a “hoax.” 
It’s a sign that attempts to suppress and polarize climate concerns may not be seeing full success, said Grace Adcox, senior climate strategist at Data for Progress. 
“We started with the question of ‘are extreme weather events increasing,’ because we thought [that] if we can find consensus on that, that can be an entry point to being able to have a more bipartisan conversation about climate and climate intervention,” she said. 
About 61 percent of likely American voters believe extreme weather events have become more frequent over the past five years, the survey from the progressive polling firm Data for Progress, shared exclusively with the Guardian, found. 
That includes 72 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of Independents, and nearly half—46 percent—of all Republicans. 
Sheldon Whitehouse, the Rhode Island senator who has long criticized Democrats for quieting their talk of global warming—or “climate-hushing”—said the new data “adds to the mountain of evidence that the public is way ahead of the politicians on the dire consequences of climate change.” 
“Extreme heat happens to have the biggest footprint in the American context compared to some of these other types of extreme weather.” 
“Climate hushers who ignore this righteous fight should take note,” he told the Guardian . 
The researchers also asked participants about whether or not specific forms of extreme weather are being “worsened by climate change.” 
Majorities linked climate change to worsening wildfires (64 percent), droughts (63 percent), flooding and flash flooding (62 percent), hurricanes (59 percent), and severe thunderstorms and hailstorms (59 percent). 
But heatwaves topped the list, with 67 percent saying climate change is making them worse—including 48 percent of Republicans, the highest share for any of the extreme weather events surveyed. 
That could be because nearly everyone in the US has experienced unusually hot days or weeks in recent years, said Adcox. 
High temperatures kill more people annually in the US than hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods combined. 
“There are regional differences across experiences with extreme weather,” said Adcox. 
“Extreme heat happens to have the biggest footprint in the American context compared to some of these other types of extreme weather.” 
The finding indicates that scorching conditions could provide an “interesting opening salvo” to speak about the climate crisis, she added. 
Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, said the new poll’s findings are “very consistent” with the conclusions researchers have drawn based on Yale’s surveys , which have shown Americans are increasingly linking extreme weather to the climate crisis and want to protect workers from heat . 
But Jennifer Marlon, a senior research scientist at Yale who also focuses on climate communications, said despite this, it’s not clear if most Americans understand why exactly the climate is changing. 
“This is probably the biggest misconception out there—many Americans still think the warming is due to some kind of natural cycle. 
But it isn’t,” she said, adding that a spring survey from Yale Program on Climate Change Communication found 27 percent of people think that the changes are mostly natural. 
The survey findings could help inform how to frame future conversations about the climate crisis with skeptical Americans, said Adcox. 
For instance, the data indicates heat may be the form of extreme weather that invites most conversation about climate. 
“You can say, hey, this extreme heat event is crazy, so let’s talk about it, let’s talk about why it’s happening,” she said. 
“These findings send a powerful message: protecting workers from dangerous heat isn’t a partisan issue.” 
Another survey finding also indicates that even Americans who may not be convinced that the climate crisis is human-caused—or even that it is happening—would support some climate justice-focused measures. 
Amid global and national rising temperatures, workers who labor outdoors—such as construction workers, farm workers, and roofers—are among the populations most vulnerable to heat-related illness. 
In fact, extreme heat is a leading contributor to workplace injuries and deaths. 
Some indoor workers, including those in warehouses, commercial kitchens, and manufacturing facilities, can also face severe heat risk due to a lack of air conditioning, poor ventilation, humidity, and other factors. 
It’s a risk that the polling indicates most Americans think lawmakers should address. 
About 88 percent of participants in the Data for Progress survey said they favor policies in their own state requiring employers to provide heat protections like access to drinking water, shade, breaks, and air conditioning. 
Only 7 percent of likely voters said they oppose the policy, indicating broad support for the protections that previous Data for Progress polls have also shown . 
“These findings send a powerful message: protecting workers from dangerous heat isn’t a partisan issue,” said Jessica E Martinez, executive director of the National Council for Occupational Safety and Health, a network of two dozen local grassroots worker organizations. 
“When 88 percent of likely voters  support requiring employers to provide basic, lifesaving heat protections, it’s clear the public expects every worker to be protected.” 
She said the polling indicates the public would support the creation of a federal heat standard —something workers have demanded for years, but on which progress has stalled under Trump. 
The current administration this April also allowed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s nationwide enforcement initiative focused on protecting workers from heat illness, then later issued a revised but vastly weakened program. 
“Our hope in continuing to profile the broad and particularly strong support that we see across partisanship for extreme heat protections for workers is a way for us to illustrate what it could look like to take an approach to climate that puts working people first,” said Adcox. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.4%Dharna Noor: 6.4%Mother Jones: 4.0%Confirmation Bias16.4%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 1.1%Mother Jones: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Dharna Noor: 4.1%Mother Jones: 3.3%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 7.1%Dharna Noor: 0.8%Mother Jones: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.9%Mother Jones: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Dharna Noor: 15.0%Mother Jones: 7.2%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Dharna Noor: 0.6%Mother Jones: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 3.2%Dharna Noor: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.2%This article: 9.7%Dharna Noor: 1.8%Mother Jones: 1.6%Optimism Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 1.3%Mother Jones: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Dharna Noor: 9.0%Mother Jones: 9.6%Negativity Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 1.2%Mother Jones: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 1.9%Mother Jones: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Dharna Noor: 0.9%Mother Jones: 1.0%In-Group Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.4%Mother Jones: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.3%Mother Jones: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 2.3%Mother Jones: 1.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.5%Dharna Noor: 4.4%Mother Jones: 3.6%Appeal to Authority9.5%This article: 2.9%Dharna Noor: 0.8%Mother Jones: 1.4%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.8%Mother Jones: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 4.2%Mother Jones: 4.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.3%Dharna Noor: 1.8%Mother Jones: 0.5%Bandwagon5.3%This article: 1.5%Dharna Noor: 5.5%Mother Jones: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion1.5%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.6%Mother Jones: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 3.1%Mother Jones: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.4%Mother Jones: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.1%Dharna Noor: 2.2%Mother Jones: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.1%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.2%Mother Jones: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 0.2%Mother Jones: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.4%Dharna Noor: 2.2%Mother Jones: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice0.4%This article: 1.5%Dharna Noor: 1.2%Mother Jones: 1.8%Indoctrination1.5%This article: 7.4%Dharna Noor: 8.2%Mother Jones: 4.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Dharna Noor: 1.8%Mother Jones: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Dharna Noor: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.8%

1002 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers47%attributed speech530writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 27 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAnthony Leiserowitz • 51 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Marlon • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Marlon • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Marlon • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJessica E Martinez • 39 words • 0.0% coverageJessica E Martinez • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageGrace Adcox • 48 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sheldon Whitehouse

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words13% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Left Leaning B-14.0 ptsWriter: 14.0%Sheldon Whitehouse: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Sheldon Whitehouse: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Sheldon Whitehouse: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.