Author summary
57%2 analyzed articles/videos1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dharna Noor results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,310 hits. Analysis detected 7,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,730 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,056 of 6,362 authors). This Dharna Noor is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Dharna Noor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
37%Dharna Noor (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,730
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos