Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Activism results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,627 hits. Analysis detected 18,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,488 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,459 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Activism is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Climate Activism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 18,488
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos