Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland Metroparks results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 61.2% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 531 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of 99% (255 of 16,562 topics). This Cleveland Metroparks is worse (more manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Cleveland Metroparks
Topic details
Total words: 531
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.5% percentile 19.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles531 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 61.2% 61.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 34.3% 34.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 56.1% 56.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 29.2% 29.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 25.1% 25.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 18.5% 18.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 24.5% 24.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 29.2% 29.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Topic 61.2%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Topic 56.1%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 25.1%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst