Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Class Warfare results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 811 hits. Analysis detected 5,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,999 of 15,744 topics). This Class Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Class Warfare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos