Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarence Thomas Dissent results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 545 hits. Analysis detected 3,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,536 of 16,562 topics). This Clarence Thomas Dissent is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Clarence Thomas Dissent
Topic details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.2%14.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos