Topic summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Hall results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 601 hits . Analysis detected 6,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,970 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,297 of 16,562 topics). This City Hall is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. City Hall
Topic details
Total words: 5,970
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst