Author summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fran Spielman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,141 hits . Analysis detected 5,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,244 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,932 of 6,506 authors). This Fran Spielman is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Fran Spielman
Author details
Total words: 5,244
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 21.8% 21.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst