Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Government Funding results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 6,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,175 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,488 of 16,562 topics). This City Government Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
City Government Funding
Topic details
Total words: 6,175
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos