Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These City Council Elections results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 1,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This City Council Elections is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
City Council Elections
Topic details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.5%16.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos