Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chronic Disease Management results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, False Dilemma, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 4,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,021 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,086 of 16,562 topics). This Chronic Disease Management is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Chronic Disease Management
Topic details
Total words: 5,021
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos