Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christmas Trees results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 2,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 747 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (400 of 16,562 topics). This Christmas Trees is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Christmas Trees
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 747
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.6% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles747 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 41.0%41.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 34.5%34.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 42.6%42.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 22.2%22.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.8%40.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.9%19.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 15.8%15.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.3%18.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 42.6%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 41.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 40.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 34.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos