Topic summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Counseling results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 576 hits. Analysis detected 2,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,571 of 22,944 topics). This Christian Counseling is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Christian Counseling
Topic details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.5%14.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos