Topic summary
⁠99%3 analyzed articles/videos511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Communist Party results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,040 hits. Analysis detected 13,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,707 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,258 of 16,562 topics). This Chinese Communist Party is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Chinese Communist Party
Topic details
Total words: 4,707
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.4% percentile
7.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.6%19.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.7%21.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.9%20.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 13.7%13.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.2%13.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.9%12.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos