Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Government results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,094 hits. Analysis detected 3,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,429 of 15,769 topics). This China Government is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
China Government
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos