Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Children In Incidents results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 2,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,152 of 16,562 topics). This Children In Incidents is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Children In Incidents
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 43.5%43.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.1%28.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 11.0%11.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.3%26.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 43.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos