Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Children & Families results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 2,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,101 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,650 of 16,562 topics). This Children & Families is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Children & Families
Topic details
Total words: 3,101
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos