Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richaa Hoysala results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,631 of 6,365 authors). This Richaa Hoysala is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Richaa Hoysala
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
75%Richaa Hoysala (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.5%5.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.8%4.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos