Author summary
86%1 analyzed article/video419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Calame results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,257 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,011 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Calame is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Sarah Calame
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
85%Sarah Calame (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,257
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.8% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 8.0%8.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos