Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Welfare Checks results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 1,933 hits. Analysis detected 9,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,565 of 16,562 topics). This Child Welfare Checks is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Child Welfare Checks
Topic details
Total words: 5,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.4%31.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.7%32.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 13.9%13.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos