Author summary
77% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison Sherry results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 4,257 hits . Analysis detected 23,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,142 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,536 of 6,521 authors). This Allison Sherry is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Allison Sherry
Author details
Total words: 17,142
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.8% 24.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst