Topic summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Sexual Abuse Material results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 911 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,335 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,446 of 16,562 topics). This Child Sexual Abuse Material is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Child Sexual Abuse Material
Topic details
Total words: 1,335
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst