Topic summary
⁠9%2 analyzed articles/videos760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Pornography results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,709 of 16,562 topics). This Child Pornography is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Child Pornography
Topic details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos