Topic summary
⁠93%3 analyzed articles/videos1,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago White Sox results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 803 hits. Analysis detected 5,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,530 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,492 of 16,562 topics). This Chicago White Sox is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Chicago White Sox
Topic details
Total words: 4,530
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos