Chicago Baseball 19%

7/24/2026, 1:58:40 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 281 faulty-reasoning hits from 258 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,795 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the article peer group.

The Chicago White Sox are one of the hottest teams in baseball, so it makes sense they’re collaborating with the hottest food show on the internet. 
Man who slapped Cubs fan for not standing during National Anthem speaks out 
Viral video shows Cubs fan being slapped for not standing during National Anthem 
Cubs' roster moves include activating Jameson Taillon, placing Phil Maton on IL 
Chicago White Sox 2027 schedule includes summer dates vs. 
Cubs, Red Sox 
Chicago Cubs' 2027 schedule released as team plans to host All-Star Game 
How the Home Run Derby rule changes benefitted Munetaka Murakami 
Montgomery has career-high 4 RBIs in 9-1 win, White Sox extend A's losing streak 
Chicago White Sox select UCLA shortstop Roch Cholowsky with No. 1 pick in MLB draft 
Young fan's heartwarming note to Justin Steele leaves Cubs pitcher ‘crying' 
Former White Sox catcher AJ Pierzynski gives Pope Leo perfect gift 
Chicago Cubs acquire left-hander David Peterson in a trade with the New York Mets 
Dansby Swanson's RBI rampage against Mets lands him in historic company 
Ben Brown, Edward Cabrera latest Cubs to land on injured list 
Chicago Cubs permitted to add more advertising signs outside Wrigley Field 
Webb sharp again, Giants beat Cubs 5-1 to avoid series sweep 
Alex Bregman says he's been ‘God awful' in clutch situations for Cubs 
‘I've been terrible': Alex Bregman takes blame after Cubs' loss to Giants 
White Sox to welcome back fan favorites for alumni home run derby 
Colson Montgomery homers as White Sox rally in 7th to top Tigers 2-1 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%NBC Chicago: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 4.3%NBC Chicago: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%NBC Chicago: 9.1%Framing Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%NBC Chicago: 11.8%Negativity Bias14.3%This article: 9.3%NBC Chicago: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%NBC Chicago: 3.6%Halo Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 2.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.9%NBC Chicago: 3.4%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.0%NBC Chicago: 1.8%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.1%NBC Chicago: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.1%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.6%NBC Chicago: 1.6%Unattributed Quote13.6%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.0%NBC Chicago: 10.1%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC Chicago: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%NBC Chicago: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.0%

258 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers14%attributed speech223writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAJ Pierzynski • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bregman • 12 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Bregman • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alex Bregman

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words69% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alex Bregman: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -16.1 ptsWriter: 16.1%Alex Bregman: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Alex Bregman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.