Keyword summary
36% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago White Sox results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 849 hits . Analysis detected 4,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,990 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,219 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago White Sox is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Chicago White Sox
Keyword details
Total words: 6,990
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst