OutKick89%

Brooke Fletcher makes White Sox history, Taylor Swift's fake castle & OnlyFans models have PR firms now 12%

By Amber Harding0%

6/30/2026, 8:01:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 897 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,568 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,374 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the article peer group.

We've made it, folks. 
To the halfway point of 2026. 
Incredible, right? 
It feels like just yesterday I was ringing in the New Year  watching drunk Anderson Cooper on my TV and sipping champagne with my dog. 
The dog wasn't sipping champagne, of course, but you know what I mean. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE 
And now we're in the last day of June. 
It's hotter than the devil's buttcrack outside, the air smells like campfires and bug spray, and some of you are enjoying your last few days with all 10 of your fingers. 
That's right, it's Fourth of July week, baby. 
America 250. 
Physically, I'm writing Nightcaps at my dining room table. 
Mentally, I'm four Miller Lites deep and sucking on a glizzy with my rear end firmly planted in an inner tube. 
A glizzy is a hot dog, by the way. 
Don't be a pervert. 
Although "sucking on" is an appalling way to refer to consuming a hot dog. 
Don't blame me. 
Blame John Mellencamp. 
It's been one hell of a week for me. 
If you recall, this time last week I was on my way to New York City to visit Fox HQ. 
I don't have any wild stories for you from the Big Apple because I spent most of my time doing super duper important work stuff. 
But it was really rad to meet many of the faces I see in Zoom boxes in actual human form. 
Good people there at the New York office. 
And I did have a couple hours of free time. 
So, naturally, I went to the Top of the Rock. 
Touristy, sure. 
But I'm a sucker for a view. 
Immediately when I got home from New York, I dumped out my suitcase and re-packed it to go to Athens, Tennessee. 
*What the hell is in Athens, Tennessee? 
* 
I'm so glad you asked. 
See, I'm a member of a book club here in my humble Nashville suburb. 
We read a lot of novels, and we meet at a brewery every two weeks to talk about them. 
This past weekend, 15 of us went on a retreat to a gorgeous house with a saltwater pool and a water slide. 
In Athens, Tennessee! 
Let me tell you something. 
I am feeling refreshed as heck  despite all the charcuterie and booze I inhaled over those three days. 
Sometimes  after a stressful week of work travel  you just need a little girl power. 
So log off and grab a margarita slushie. 
Let's do some Nightcaps. 
Brooke Fletcher makes history 
Speaking of girl power, did you see what Brooke Fletcher did last week? 
Brooke is a White Sox reporter for CHSN. 
When regular color analyst Steve Stone fell ill, she had to take over. 
And she became the first female TV analyst in White Sox history. 
If you're unfamiliar with Brooke's work, she is incredibly talented and deserving of this opportunity. 
Don't you go throwing any DEI accusations around because I will pull receipts faster than Dianna Russini pulled up her text messages to get out of that speeding ticket. 
But Brooke also happens to be the daughter of former White Sox shortstop Scott Fletcher. 
And over the weekend, her dad surprised her with a souvenir from her night in the booth. 
Brooke's crying. 
Scott's crying. 
I'm crying. 
You're crying. 
What a moment! 
And now onto something significantly less heartwarming. 
This Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding is getting worse by the minute 
I know, you're tired of hearing (reading?) 
me gripe about it. 
And since the wedding is (allegedly) on Friday, there's an end in sight. 
KYLIE JENNER INSPIRES KNICKS LINGERIE, SWIFT-KELCE MSG WEDDING RUMORS & GERMAN DISCOVERS WAFFLE HOUSE 
But I simply refuse to believe Taylor Swift is actually choosing to have her wedding at Madison Square Garden. 
Yuck. 
Ew. 
Blech. 
The tackiness, the sticky folding chairs, the ugly basketball arena aesthetic. 
There's no way this billionaire pop star  who has endless options and an unlimited budget  is really getting married at MSG, right? 
You have to be kidding me. 
I refuse to believe they are actually getting married at MSG. 
This has to be a red herring to send the paparazzi elsewhere so that they can have their actual wedding somewhere majestic and private and beautiful. 
And then. 
As if things couldn't get any worse. 
I see this. 
They're building a CASTLE. 
Taylor, my sister in Christ. 
You have the money to go to Europe and rent out an actual castle. 
Please tell me this is just some sort of elaborate setup for a fan club party. 
Look, I know it's not my wedding. 
My wedding was perfect (minus the weather and the chemical burns). 
So I shouldn't be so invested in what Taylor Swift and dopey Travis Kelce are doing about their wedding venue. 
But something about this circus just offends me on a spiritual level. 
Let's open the mailbag. 
📩 Email: amber.harding@outkick.com (Send your thoughts, stories, tips, rants and photos of your dog.) 
🐦 Twitter/X: @TheAmberHarding 
📸 Instagram: @amberharding 
OnlyFans models are hiring PR firms now 
Folks, I s--- you not. 
One of the more annoying things about being a reporter is that your inbox is constantly flooded with PR pitches. 
Some of them are relevant. 
Most of them are not. 
A good majority of the emails I get are just people who want me to shill some sort of random household item you can order on Amazon. 
But this... this was a first. 
Yes, friends, that is an official PR pitch from an agency that solely represents OnlyFans models and other "adult" creators. 
Complete with quotes and a Google Drive folder full of approved photos. 
Unbelievable stuff. 
I have, of course, redacted the model's name. 
No free promotions from me, young lady! 
But  out of curiosity  I did go to her Instagram profile and saw that a guy I briefly dated back in 2019 follows her. 
Probably just for her expert insight on soccer fans. 
Definitely not for her enormous fake boobs. 
What a world we live in. 
Do we hate America and Caitlin Clark? 
I love it when y'all email me or comment on my social media. 
I really do. 
Even if you're (respectfully) giving me a hard time about something I wrote, it's fun to hear from you. 
But every once in a while, someone goes above and beyond to tell me just what a jackass they think I am. 
Like this sweet 72-year-old lady Jeri, for example, who landed in my Instagram DM requests yesterday -- fuming over an article I wrote about Caitlin Clark. 
**Jeri Wrote:** *"Typical Faux News story dissing Caitlin Clark. 
God, you people are amazing. 
Lost souls who hate America. 
All you need is blonde hair to complete the clueless ensemble." 
* 
That is certainly ...a take. 
I cannot fathom how a person can look at Fox News or OutKick and think to themselves, "Wow, these people really hate America and Caitlin Clark." 
CAITLIN CLARK. 
We post stories singing Caitlin's praises every single day of the week and twice on Sunday. 
Jeri, what do you mean?! 
And so I asked her exactly that. 
Turns out, it was an article I wrote yesterday about click-me artist Emmanuel Acho claiming that the WNBA would be "better off" without Caitlin. 
That really got Jeri's knickers in a twist. 
I, obviously, reported what Acho said and then explained *why* what he said was complete buffoonery. 
It was a pro-Caitlin Clark article. 
Hence my confusion. 
**Jeri Elaborated:** *"I think your article was a very mixed message. 
On purpose? 
Who knows. 
Most of it was spent giving credit to the dissers, with a few sentences at the end in support. 
Faux news distorts everything it touches. 
I am a middle of the road person. 
I honestly hate the crap that comes from faux news." 
* 
Why Jeri spends so much time scanning a website she hates, I do not know. 
I wonder if she's seeing this column, too. 
But methinks we can chalk this one up to a reading comprehension problem on her part. 
Also, there's nothing wrong with blondes. 
Luke Bryan finally leans into his stupid song about climbing trees 
**Caitlin R. 
Writes:** *OK, last one on this, but did you see what Luke posted??? 
* 😂 
**Amber:** 
Last month, Luke Bryan released one of the most embarrassing songs in country music history. 
Golf. 
Fish. 
Hunt. 
Drink. 
Do the hokey pokey. 
Turn yourself around. 
I don't know, it's a blur to me. 
But I pointed out in Nightcaps how God awful terrible this song was. 
I was certainly not the only one to point it out. 
His comments were full of people just absolutely s---ing on this song. 
And, at first, Luke got defensive. 
I was adamant that this was absolutely the wrong way to handle things. 
His only recourse was to completely lean in. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Make jokes about the absurdity of this song. 
Sell camo T-Shirts with "CLIMB TREE" in big, bold letters. 
Own it. 
Glad to see he's finally taking my advice. 
I'm so much smarter than Jeri gives me credit for. 
Stuff I Liked 
*OutKick Nightcaps is a daily column set to run Monday through Friday at 4 p.m. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Amber Harding: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias5.7%This article: 0.4%Amber Harding: 4.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect0.4%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Amber Harding: 5.5%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias5.0%This article: 3.2%Amber Harding: 2.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.6%Amber Harding: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias1.2%This article: 0.9%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.9%This article: 1.5%Amber Harding: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect1.5%This article: 0.4%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.4%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem2.5%This article: 0.4%Amber Harding: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.4%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%Amber Harding: 6.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.7%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.7%This article: 1.8%Amber Harding: 3.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion1.8%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.1%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.1%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.4%Amber Harding: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal2.4%This article: 0.5%Amber Harding: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.5%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 4.5%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity4.5%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy1.0%This article: 1.3%Amber Harding: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote1.3%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.7%Amber Harding: 12.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice10.7%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 1.6%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Amber Harding: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

1568 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers6.6%attributed speech1,465writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageJeri • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJeri • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJeri • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 6 words • 100.0% coverageJeri • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJeri • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCaitlin R. • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCaitlin R. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeri

98%flagged-word coverage
88 attributed words85% of attributed speech42% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Politically Left Leaning B+28.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeri: 28.4%28.4%Unattributed Quote+22.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeri: 22.7%22.7%Biased Writer Voice-11.4 ptsWriter: 11.4%Jeri: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Jeri: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.