Topic summary
49% 7 analyzed articles/videos 937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,389 hits . Analysis detected 7,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,196 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (9,989 of 15,759 topics). This Chicago is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Chicago
Topic details
Total words: 8,196
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst