Topic summary
⁠22%2 analyzed articles/videos1,568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Character Development results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,172 hits. Analysis detected 4,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,403 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,109 of 16,562 topics). This Character Development is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Character Development
Topic details
Total words: 5,403
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.7%21.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos