Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis Gutierrez results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Loss Aversion , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,965 of 6,528 authors). This Luis Gutierrez is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Luis Gutierrez
Author details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst