Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Celebrity Lawsuit results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Lawsuit is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Celebrity Lawsuit
Topic details
Total words: 892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles892 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos